Examiner Stephen Bray

Grant ratio: 39.6% (13th percentile in Art Unit 2621 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.09. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2019
Grant ratio 39.6%
Average office actions / grant 3.09
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85474
Primary art unit
2621
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
235
Granted applications
93

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 44.4% 2.21
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.76 689 office actions across 250 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 250 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 72 28.8%
2 OAs 75 30.0%
3 OAs 35 14.0%
4 OAs 29 11.6%
5+ OAs 39 15.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 23.5% 2009 2010: 8.7% 2010 2011: 60.0% 2011 2012: 43.8% 2012 2013: 10.0% 2013 2014: 8.0% 2014 2015: 45.5% 2015 2016: 61.1% 2016 2017: 44.4% 2017 2018: 80.8% 2018 2019: 62.5% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008500.0%
200917423.5%
20102328.7%
2011201260.0%
201216743.8%
201320210.0%
20142528.0%
2015221045.5%
2016181161.1%
2017271244.4%
2018262180.8%
2019161062.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 250 0.0% 2.0% 95.2% 1.6%
Action 2 178 0.0% 0.6% 97.8% 1.7%
Action 3 103 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 1.0%
Action 4 68 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 39 0.0% 0.0% 97.4% 2.6%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 689 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 29, 2020 14/261,112 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 7, 2019 14/142,640 Reversed §103
Jul. 25, 2017 14/190,420 Affirmed §103
Jun. 29, 2016 12/194,752 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 29, 2016 11/966,190 Affirmed §103
Apr. 11, 2014 11/309,870 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.