Examiner Tony N. Ngo

Grant ratio: 55.2% (28th percentile in Art Unit 2622 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2018
Grant ratio 55.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.88
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87792
Primary art unit
2622
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
210
Granted applications
116

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 58.1% 1.87
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.69 629 office actions across 234 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 234 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 58 24.8%
2 OAs 85 36.3%
3 OAs 32 13.7%
4 OAs 27 11.5%
5+ OAs 32 13.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 27.8% 2011 2012: 37.0% 2012 2013: 35.7% 2013 2014: 59.6% 2014 2015: 62.5% 2015 2016: 72.7% 2016 2017: 70.3% 2017 2018: 85.7% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201118527.8%
2012271037.0%
2013281035.7%
2014472859.6%
2015241562.5%
2016221672.7%
2017372670.3%
20187685.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 234 1.3% 37.2% 60.7% 0.0%
Action 2 176 1.7% 30.1% 66.5% 0.6%
Action 3 91 1.1% 22.0% 74.7% 1.1%
Action 4 59 0.0% 20.3% 78.0% 0.0%
Action 5 32 3.1% 9.4% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 6 23 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.3% 8 of 629 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
4.3%
3.7%
2.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 14. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 8/14 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
64.3% 9/14 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 4, 2020 14/516,948 Reversed §102
Mar. 28, 2018 14/973,011 Affirmed §103
Jun. 22, 2017 12/531,177 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 28, 2017 12/606,340 Reversed §103
Jan. 18, 2017 12/461,675 Affirmed §103
Jan. 13, 2017 12/078,132 Reversed §103
Nov. 7, 2016 13/466,250 Reversed §102
Sep. 26, 2016 12/839,280 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 22, 2016 13/204,828 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 25, 2016 12/093,605 Affirmed §103
Nov. 23, 2015 12/750,688 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 17, 2015 12/606,934 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.