Examiner Sarvesh J. Nadkarni

Grant ratio: 64.8% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.25
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83073
Primary art unit
2623
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
540
Granted applications
350
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7562
Supervisor
Lunyi Lao
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7671

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 14 64.4% 1.99
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 1,301 office actions across 540 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 538 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.4%
1 OA 209 38.7%
2 OAs 134 24.8%
3 OAs 76 14.1%
4 OAs 59 10.9%
5+ OAs 60 11.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 26.7% 2011 2012: 57.1% 2012 2013: 76.3% 2013 2014: 54.1% 2014 2015: 53.8% 2015 2016: 58.3% 2016 2017: 69.2% 2017 2018: 60.0% 2018 2019: 73.3% 2019 2020: 89.1% 2020 2021: 90.0% 2021 2022: 87.9% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 84.4% 2024 2025: 45.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201115426.7%
2012352057.1%
2013382976.3%
2014372054.1%
2015261453.8%
2016362158.3%
2017261869.2%
2018352160.0%
2019453373.3%
2020464189.1%
2021302790.0%
2022332987.9%
2023403587.5%
2024322784.4%
2025241145.8%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 538 0.4% 3.7% 93.1% 1.5%
Action 2 329 0.0% 2.4% 95.7% 0.6%
Action 3 195 0.0% 0.5% 96.9% 0.5%
Action 4 119 0.0% 0.0% 99.2% 0.8%
Action 5 60 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 33 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 211 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,301 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 10, 2021 15/054,817 Affirmed §103
Oct. 19, 2021 15/974,904 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 27, 2016 12/083,652 Reversed N/A
Sep. 24, 2015 12/682,235 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 20, 2015 12/427,108 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.