Examiner Vincent Rudolph

Grant ratio: 41.7% (26th percentile in Art Unit 2625 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 41.7%
Average office actions / grant 3.53
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81106
Primary art unit
2625
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
252
Granted applications
105
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8243
Supervisor
Firmin Backer
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6703

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 54.7% 2.08
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.98 750 office actions across 252 applications
Applications with office actions 92.9% 234 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 18 7.1%
1 OA 47 18.7%
2 OAs 54 21.4%
3 OAs 37 14.7%
4 OAs 46 18.3%
5+ OAs 50 19.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 20.0% 2009 2010: 48.3% 2010 2011: 68.4% 2011 2012: 65.9% 2012 2013: 61.3% 2013 2014: 47.1% 2014 2015: 25.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 33.3% 2022 2025: 18.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081700.0%
200915320.0%
2010291448.3%
2011382668.4%
2012412765.9%
2013311961.3%
201417847.1%
201512325.0%
20161600.0%
202111100.0%
20226233.3%
202511218.2%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 234 1.7% 22.6% 71.4% 0.9%
Action 2 187 1.1% 8.6% 85.6% 3.2%
Action 3 133 0.8% 5.3% 91.7% 2.3%
Action 4 96 2.1% 1.0% 93.8% 3.1%
Action 5 50 4.0% 0.0% 90.0% 2.0%
Action 6 28 3.6% 0.0% 96.4% 0.0%
Action 7 14 7.1% 0.0% 92.9% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 37 office actions
All years 1.7% 13 of 750 office actions
Change -1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
3.4%
2.3%
1.3%
2014: Alice
2.4%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 12, 2017 13/361,064 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 22, 2017 13/216,366 Affirmed §103
Sep. 30, 2016 13/952,548 Affirmed §103
Aug. 29, 2016 12/255,095 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 1, 2016 13/907,583 Affirmed §103
Mar. 10, 2015 10/316,679 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2012 10/153,281 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.