Examiner Roberta Prendergast

Grant ratio: 50.3% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2628 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.34. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: May 2016
Grant ratio 50.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.34
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80722
Primary art unit
2628
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
159
Granted applications
80

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 55.4% 1.88
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.51 399 office actions across 159 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 159 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 58 36.5%
2 OAs 43 27.0%
3 OAs 19 11.9%
4 OAs 19 11.9%
5+ OAs 20 12.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.5% 2008 2009: 52.0% 2009 2010: 60.9% 2010 2011: 57.7% 2011 2012: 23.1% 2012 2013: 46.7% 2013 2014: 27.8% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008291965.5%
2009251352.0%
2010231460.9%
2011261557.7%
201213323.1%
201315746.7%
201418527.8%
20158450.0%
2016200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 159 0.0% 8.2% 90.6% 0.6%
Action 2 101 2.0% 2.0% 92.1% 3.0%
Action 3 58 5.2% 5.2% 89.7% 0.0%
Action 4 39 2.6% 0.0% 94.9% 2.6%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.5% 6 of 399 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.3%
4.3%
0.0%
3.7%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 12, 2014 11/083,306 Reversed §103
Aug. 29, 2014 11/419,017 Reversed §103
Jul. 31, 2013 10/039,187 Reversed N/A
Jan. 30, 2013 11/355,338 Affirmed §103
Mar. 10, 2011 11/230,803 Reversed §103
Mar. 8, 2011 10/911,463 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.