Examiner Srilakshmi K. Kumar

Grant ratio: 60.8% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2629 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: June 2026
Grant ratio 60.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76804
Primary art unit
2629
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
334
Granted applications
203

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 42.6% 2.03
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 724 office actions across 334 applications
Applications with office actions 88.6% 296 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 38 11.4%
1 OA 84 25.1%
2 OAs 120 35.9%
3 OAs 33 9.9%
4 OAs 25 7.5%
5+ OAs 34 10.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 71.0% 2008 2009: 73.7% 2009 2010: 81.6% 2010 2011: 71.7% 2011 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 47.6% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 11.1% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008312271.0%
2009765673.7%
2010494081.6%
2011533871.7%
2012493571.4%
2013211047.6%
2014300.0%
20159111.1%
2016100.0%
2021200.0%
202211100.0%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 296 0.0% 22.6% 64.9% 2.0%
Action 2 212 0.5% 11.3% 69.3% 6.6%
Action 3 92 0.0% 7.6% 73.9% 7.6%
Action 4 59 0.0% 6.8% 76.3% 8.5%
Action 5 34 0.0% 11.8% 76.5% 8.8%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 11 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 48 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 724 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 4/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 23, 2017 13/110,910 Affirmed §103
Nov. 23, 2015 12/508,328 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 27, 2013 11/230,236 Affirmed §103
May. 14, 2013 10/914,466 Reversed §103
May. 13, 2013 10/250,123 Reversed §102
Apr. 23, 2013 10/673,542 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 15, 2013 10/976,785 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 4, 2012 10/166,259 Reversed §102 · §112
Apr. 27, 2012 10/764,638 Reversed §103
Apr. 18, 2012 10/438,237 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.