Examiner Waseem Moorad

Grant ratio: 32.7% (25th percentile in Art Unit 2629 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.95. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2017
Grant ratio 32.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.95
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84052
Primary art unit
2629
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
248
Granted applications
81

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 42.6% 2.03
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.76 692 office actions across 251 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 251 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 73 29.1%
2 OAs 68 27.1%
3 OAs 40 15.9%
4 OAs 35 13.9%
5+ OAs 35 13.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 8.7% 2008 2009: 13.2% 2009 2010: 34.5% 2010 2011: 35.5% 2011 2012: 34.4% 2012 2013: 52.8% 2013 2014: 41.2% 2014 2015: 87.5% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
20082328.7%
200938513.2%
2010291034.5%
2011311135.5%
2012321134.4%
2013532852.8%
201417741.2%
20158787.5%
20161000.0%
2017600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 251 0.0% 9.2% 89.6% 0.0%
Action 2 178 0.0% 4.5% 94.4% 0.6%
Action 3 110 0.9% 4.5% 93.6% 0.9%
Action 4 70 1.4% 7.1% 91.4% 0.0%
Action 5 35 0.0% 5.7% 94.3% 0.0%
Action 6 23 0.0% 8.7% 91.3% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 692 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2015 11/750,611 Affirmed §103 · §120
Apr. 27, 2015 12/011,931 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 25, 2015 11/777,035 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 15, 2014 11/751,190 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 29, 2014 11/411,915 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 29, 2014 11/153,748 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Mar. 26, 2014 11/243,841 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 20, 2014 11/777,490 Reversed N/A
Aug. 1, 2013 11/243,797 Reversed N/A
Nov. 29, 2012 10/965,806 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.