Examiner Qutbuddin Ghulamali

Grant ratio: 79.5% (30th percentile in Art Unit 2632 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 79.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.79
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79672
Primary art unit
2632
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,114
Granted applications
886
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3014
Supervisor
Chieh Fan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3042

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 73.9% 1.79
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.75 1,950 office actions across 1,114 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,110 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.4%
1 OA 634 56.9%
2 OAs 300 26.9%
3 OAs 89 8.0%
4 OAs 35 3.1%
5+ OAs 52 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 70.8% 2008 2009: 54.9% 2009 2010: 69.8% 2010 2011: 82.1% 2011 2012: 82.5% 2012 2013: 86.6% 2013 2014: 86.4% 2014 2015: 86.9% 2015 2016: 90.5% 2016 2017: 82.8% 2017 2018: 88.6% 2018 2019: 90.9% 2019 2020: 94.0% 2020 2021: 89.7% 2021 2022: 91.9% 2022 2023: 88.1% 2023 2024: 86.2% 2024 2025: 47.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241770.8%
2009512854.9%
2010533769.8%
2011564682.1%
2012635282.5%
2013675886.6%
2014665786.4%
2015615386.9%
2016635790.5%
2017584882.8%
2018706288.6%
2019666090.9%
2020676394.0%
2021585289.7%
2022625791.9%
2023595288.1%
2024655686.2%
2025663147.0%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,110 7.4% 17.8% 46.5% 19.6%
Action 2 476 5.3% 14.1% 61.8% 13.7%
Action 3 176 5.1% 8.5% 63.6% 21.0%
Action 4 87 3.4% 4.6% 78.2% 12.6%
Action 5 52 0.0% 3.8% 78.8% 17.3%
Action 6 27 0.0% 11.1% 63.0% 25.9%
Action 7 15 0.0% 6.7% 73.3% 6.7%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.1% 7 of 226 office actions
All years 6.1% 119 of 1,950 office actions
Change -3.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.3%
2.7%
3.7%
2.7%
1.8%
2.1%
2014: Alice
5.4%
1.3%
2.7%
21.6%
43.6%
2019: PEG
3.1%
2.9%
1.3%
2.4%
2.7%
2024: AI examples
5.3%
2025: August memo
1.3%
2.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 13, 2021 15/679,101 Reversed §102 · §112
Dec. 31, 2020 15/603,651 Affirmed in part §103
May. 23, 2019 14/684,496 Affirmed §103
Oct. 31, 2016 12/652,390 Reversed §103
Jul. 29, 2016 12/765,797 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 29, 2016 11/741,360 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 28, 2015 12/281,821 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.