Examiner Zewdu Kassa

Grant ratio: 83.9% (70th percentile in Art Unit 2632 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 83.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84815
Primary art unit
2632
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
839
Granted applications
704
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5253
Supervisor
David Payne
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3024

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 73.9% 1.79
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.52 1,279 office actions across 839 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 839 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 580 69.1%
2 OAs 156 18.6%
3 OAs 57 6.8%
4 OAs 26 3.1%
5+ OAs 20 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 60.6% 2008 2009: 68.1% 2009 2010: 69.0% 2010 2011: 79.6% 2011 2012: 94.8% 2012 2013: 89.8% 2013 2014: 92.0% 2014 2015: 96.0% 2015 2016: 97.7% 2016 2017: 83.8% 2017 2018: 90.9% 2018 2019: 93.3% 2019 2020: 97.4% 2020 2021: 93.3% 2021 2022: 97.5% 2022 2023: 93.0% 2023 2024: 97.6% 2024 2025: 57.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200711100.0%
2008332060.6%
2009473268.1%
2010422969.0%
2011544379.6%
2012585594.8%
2013595389.8%
2014504692.0%
2015504896.0%
2016444397.7%
2017373183.8%
2018444090.9%
2019454293.3%
2020383797.4%
2021454293.3%
2022403997.5%
2023434093.0%
2024414097.6%
2025402357.5%
20262800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 839 2.1% 5.1% 84.7% 0.0%
Action 2 259 0.0% 2.7% 96.9% 0.0%
Action 3 103 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 0.0%
Action 4 46 0.0% 0.0% 97.8% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 2 of 138 office actions
All years 1.4% 18 of 1,279 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
1.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.1%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
2019: PEG
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
4.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 1, 2022 15/995,877 Affirmed §103
Jul. 26, 2018 14/803,881 Affirmed in part §103
May. 15, 2017 13/734,772 Affirmed §103
Sep. 9, 2016 12/695,017 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 28, 2014 11/844,254 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 18, 2014 11/845,449 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.