Examiner Hibret Woldekidan

Grant ratio: 80.3% (59th percentile in Art Unit 2637 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.59. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 80.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.59
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84479
Primary art unit
2637
Work group
2630
Technology center
2600
Applications
870
Granted applications
699
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5145
Supervisor
David C Payne
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3024

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 70.8% 1.54
Group 104 68.1% 1.65
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.61 1,402 office actions across 870 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 870 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 589 67.7%
2 OAs 152 17.5%
3 OAs 67 7.7%
4 OAs 32 3.7%
5+ OAs 30 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 40.9% 2008 2009: 60.5% 2009 2010: 81.0% 2010 2011: 76.2% 2011 2012: 86.0% 2012 2013: 73.7% 2013 2014: 74.3% 2014 2015: 91.1% 2015 2016: 88.9% 2016 2017: 98.0% 2017 2018: 88.2% 2018 2019: 88.7% 2019 2020: 97.7% 2020 2021: 97.9% 2021 2022: 96.4% 2022 2023: 90.2% 2023 2024: 92.9% 2024 2025: 46.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200822940.9%
2009432660.5%
2010423481.0%
2011423276.2%
2012433786.0%
2013382873.7%
2014352674.3%
2015454191.1%
2016635688.9%
2017504998.0%
2018514588.2%
2019534788.7%
2020444397.7%
2021474697.9%
2022555396.4%
2023514690.2%
2024565292.9%
2025622946.8%
20262800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 870 2.8% 6.6% 76.1% 10.7%
Action 2 281 0.0% 2.1% 93.6% 3.6%
Action 3 129 0.0% 1.6% 93.0% 3.9%
Action 4 62 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 30 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.7% 5 of 185 office actions
All years 1.7% 24 of 1,402 office actions
Change +1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.7%
2.6%
0.0%
5.9%
2.9%
2019: PEG
4.0%
0.0%
5.2%
0.0%
6.2%
2024: AI examples
3.2%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 21, 2023 17/135,082 Affirmed §103
Dec. 1, 2021 16/118,882 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2018 15/048,924 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 12, 2018 14/828,676 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 30, 2017 14/474,174 Affirmed §103
Apr. 27, 2016 12/626,115 Affirmed §103
Mar. 16, 2016 12/847,444 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.