Examiner Christopher K. Peterson

Grant ratio: 71.3% (44th percentile in Art Unit 2661 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 71.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83343
Primary art unit
2661
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
851
Granted applications
607
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1704
Supervisor
Sinh N Tran
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7564

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 60.9% 1.61
Group 288 62.7% 1.66
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,544 office actions across 851 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 845 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.7%
1 OA 488 57.3%
2 OAs 194 22.8%
3 OAs 72 8.5%
4 OAs 52 6.1%
5+ OAs 39 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 43.5% 2008 2009: 48.9% 2009 2010: 61.2% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 67.4% 2012 2013: 77.8% 2013 2014: 68.9% 2014 2015: 61.4% 2015 2016: 87.0% 2016 2017: 81.5% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 85.7% 2019 2020: 93.9% 2020 2021: 93.0% 2021 2022: 93.2% 2022 2023: 86.7% 2023 2024: 88.1% 2024 2025: 41.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008231043.5%
2009472348.9%
2010493061.2%
2011362466.7%
2012432967.4%
2013453577.8%
2014453168.9%
2015442761.4%
2016544787.0%
2017544481.5%
2018484083.3%
2019494285.7%
2020494693.9%
2021434093.0%
2022444193.2%
2023453986.7%
2024423788.1%
2025532241.5%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 845 0.8% 11.5% 74.7% 0.5%
Action 2 357 0.0% 7.0% 85.4% 0.6%
Action 3 163 0.0% 4.3% 92.0% 0.6%
Action 4 91 1.1% 2.2% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 5 39 0.0% 5.1% 84.6% 0.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.1% 2 of 182 office actions
All years 0.5% 8 of 1,544 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
2.9%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
4.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 4, 2021 14/488,336 Reversed §103
Aug. 23, 2017 13/275,392 Affirmed §103
Apr. 26, 2013 11/053,215 Affirmed §103
Feb. 25, 2013 11/219,951 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 27, 2012 10/728,393 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.