Examiner Shervin Nakhjavan

Grant ratio: 82.8% (84th percentile in Art Unit 2666 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.43. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 82.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.43
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77342
Primary art unit
2666
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
650
Granted applications
538
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5731
Supervisor
Sue Lefkowitz
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3638

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 64.4% 1.71
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.40 909 office actions across 650 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 650 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 472 72.6%
2 OAs 124 19.1%
3 OAs 33 5.1%
4 OAs 15 2.3%
5+ OAs 6 0.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 78.1% 2010 2011: 78.9% 2011 2012: 86.8% 2012 2013: 87.1% 2013 2014: 86.4% 2014 2015: 94.6% 2015 2016: 88.9% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017 2018: 95.2% 2018 2019: 86.1% 2019 2020: 97.8% 2020 2021: 93.5% 2021 2022: 80.6% 2022 2023: 91.1% 2023 2024: 88.0% 2024 2025: 59.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010322578.1%
2011383078.9%
2012383386.8%
2013312787.1%
2014443886.4%
2015373594.6%
2016363288.9%
20173737100.0%
2018424095.2%
2019363186.1%
2020454497.8%
2021312993.5%
2022362980.6%
2023454191.1%
2024504488.0%
2025392359.0%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 650 9.8% 10.3% 54.0% 15.1%
Action 2 178 5.1% 10.1% 66.9% 10.1%
Action 3 54 3.7% 7.4% 77.8% 5.6%
Action 4 21 4.8% 4.8% 85.7% 4.8%
Action 5 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 14.4% 24 of 167 office actions
All years 8.4% 76 of 909 office actions
Change +6.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

13.6%
5.8%
4.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
4.6%
18.0%
16.0%
7.9%
7.9%
2019: PEG
3.5%
5.4%
2.6%
4.0%
4.8%
2024: AI examples
14.5%
2025: August memo
23.4%
5.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 15, 2016 13/646,860 Affirmed §102 · §112
Jan. 21, 2016 12/738,659 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 29, 2014 11/807,096 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 26, 2014 11/807,700 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.