Examiner Ming Hon

Grant ratio: 76.0% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2666 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84222
Primary art unit
2666
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
795
Granted applications
604
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5245
Supervisor
Emily Terrell
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3717

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 64.4% 1.71
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,436 office actions across 795 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 789 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.8%
1 OA 437 55.0%
2 OAs 189 23.8%
3 OAs 80 10.1%
4 OAs 54 6.8%
5+ OAs 29 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 36.8% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 69.0% 2011 2012: 68.6% 2012 2013: 78.7% 2013 2014: 88.6% 2014 2015: 76.2% 2015 2016: 91.4% 2016 2017: 93.6% 2017 2018: 88.7% 2018 2019: 87.8% 2019 2020: 91.5% 2020 2021: 95.7% 2021 2022: 88.5% 2022 2023: 89.6% 2023 2024: 91.7% 2024 2025: 32.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200816850.0%
2009381436.8%
2010302066.7%
2011292069.0%
2012513568.6%
2013473778.7%
2014443988.6%
2015423276.2%
2016353291.4%
2017474493.6%
2018534788.7%
2019494387.8%
2020474391.5%
2021464495.7%
2022524688.5%
2023484389.6%
2024484491.7%
2025401332.5%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 789 2.7% 1.0% 86.6% 4.3%
Action 2 352 1.4% 0.0% 93.8% 2.8%
Action 3 163 3.7% 0.0% 93.3% 2.5%
Action 4 83 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 29 3.4% 0.0% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 11.8%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.5% 6 of 173 office actions
All years 2.3% 33 of 1,436 office actions
Change +1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
4.9%
2.9%
1.0%
2.1%
2.1%
2.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2.6%
5.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
1.3%
4.8%
2024: AI examples
3.2%
2025: August memo
2.0%
7.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 27, 2015 11/538,538 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 18, 2015 12/352,759 Reversed N/A
Jan. 21, 2015 11/785,531 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 18, 2014 11/066,747 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 27, 2014 11/261,130 Reversed §103
Aug. 5, 2013 10/950,841 Reversed §103
Jun. 18, 2013 11/176,372 Affirmed §103
May. 17, 2011 10/941,849 Remanded N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.