Examiner Solomon Bezuayehu

Grant ratio: 65.8% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2666 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85908
Primary art unit
2666
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
672
Granted applications
442
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7452

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 64.4% 1.71
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.23 1,499 office actions across 672 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 671 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 254 37.8%
2 OAs 194 28.9%
3 OAs 105 15.6%
4 OAs 75 11.2%
5+ OAs 43 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 30.8% 2009 2010: 55.0% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 68.8% 2012 2013: 75.0% 2013 2014: 78.6% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 70.6% 2016 2017: 87.5% 2017 2018: 84.1% 2018 2019: 87.5% 2019 2020: 82.6% 2020 2021: 90.0% 2021 2022: 89.1% 2022 2023: 86.2% 2023 2024: 81.6% 2024 2025: 16.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
200926830.8%
2010201155.0%
2011361850.0%
2012322268.8%
2013403075.0%
2014282278.6%
2015573866.7%
2016342470.6%
2017403587.5%
2018443784.1%
2019322887.5%
2020463882.6%
2021302790.0%
2022464189.1%
2023292586.2%
2024383181.6%
202542716.7%
20265100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 671 3.1% 3.9% 84.2% 2.4%
Action 2 417 2.9% 1.9% 90.2% 1.7%
Action 3 223 4.9% 0.9% 89.2% 1.3%
Action 4 118 4.2% 0.8% 89.8% 0.8%
Action 5 43 9.3% 0.0% 88.4% 0.0%
Action 6 18 11.1% 0.0% 77.8% 5.6%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 6.9% 17 of 245 office actions
All years 3.7% 55 of 1,499 office actions
Change +3.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2014: Alice
0.0%
4.5%
9.7%
6.4%
14.1%
2019: PEG
1.1%
0.0%
1.9%
2.2%
2.9%
2024: AI examples
7.2%
2025: August memo
5.2%
10.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 14, 2019 15/459,861 Reversed §101 · §103
Dec. 30, 2016 11/111,051 Affirmed §103
Sep. 23, 2015 12/126,802 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.