Examiner Gregory M. Desire

Grant ratio: 87.0% (91st percentile in Art Unit 2668 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.28. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 87.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.28
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74775
Primary art unit
2668
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,120
Granted applications
974
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7449
Supervisor
Henok Shiferaw
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4637

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 62.5% 1.58
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.26 1,413 office actions across 1,120 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,120 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 891 79.6%
2 OAs 187 16.7%
3 OAs 28 2.5%
4 OAs 8 0.7%
5+ OAs 6 0.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 88.5% 2008 2009: 78.5% 2009 2010: 84.1% 2010 2011: 88.7% 2011 2012: 89.6% 2012 2013: 97.2% 2013 2014: 87.9% 2014 2015: 89.1% 2015 2016: 94.0% 2016 2017: 92.6% 2017 2018: 96.6% 2018 2019: 94.8% 2019 2020: 90.8% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 96.4% 2023 2024: 88.7% 2024 2025: 52.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008524688.5%
2009796278.5%
2010695884.1%
2011625588.7%
2012776989.6%
2013727097.2%
2014665887.9%
2015554989.1%
2016504794.0%
2017545092.6%
2018585696.6%
2019585594.8%
2020655990.8%
20215353100.0%
20226060100.0%
2023565496.4%
2024534788.7%
2025502652.0%
20263100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,120 12.2% 31.7% 39.8% 1.6%
Action 2 229 20.5% 24.9% 35.4% 1.7%
Action 3 42 16.7% 21.4% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 4 14 0.0% 14.3% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 5 6 16.7% 16.7% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 3 of 164 office actions
All years 13.6% 192 of 1,413 office actions
Change -11.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

22.0%
33.0%
20.4%
33.3%
16.7%
23.1%
2014: Alice
10.6%
10.3%
6.5%
7.4%
11.9%
2019: PEG
6.1%
1.4%
1.7%
1.6%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.9%
6.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 15, 2014 11/478,710 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.