Examiner Sean Motsinger

Grant ratio: 72.0% (40th percentile in Art Unit 2669 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.61. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.61
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82506
Primary art unit
2669
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
722
Granted applications
520
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1237
Supervisor
Chineyere Wills-Burns
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-9752

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 60.7% 1.60
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.70 1,229 office actions across 722 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 722 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 436 60.4%
2 OAs 170 23.5%
3 OAs 55 7.6%
4 OAs 36 5.0%
5+ OAs 25 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.7% 2008 2009: 60.4% 2009 2010: 72.2% 2010 2011: 68.4% 2011 2012: 73.5% 2012 2013: 70.5% 2013 2014: 80.0% 2014 2015: 87.5% 2015 2016: 76.2% 2016 2017: 81.3% 2017 2018: 93.6% 2018 2019: 91.4% 2019 2020: 87.1% 2020 2021: 94.1% 2021 2022: 79.4% 2022 2023: 85.3% 2023 2024: 85.4% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008351645.7%
2009482960.4%
2010362672.2%
2011382668.4%
2012493673.5%
2013443170.5%
2014302480.0%
2015322887.5%
2016423276.2%
2017322681.3%
2018474493.6%
2019353291.4%
2020312787.1%
2021343294.1%
2022342779.4%
2023342985.3%
2024413585.4%
2025412048.8%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 722 6.0% 7.1% 68.7% 15.5%
Action 2 286 7.7% 4.5% 76.2% 9.1%
Action 3 116 6.9% 4.3% 82.8% 5.2%
Action 4 61 3.3% 1.6% 78.7% 16.4%
Action 5 25 8.0% 0.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 6 12 8.3% 0.0% 83.3% 8.3%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 10.2% 19 of 187 office actions
All years 6.3% 78 of 1,229 office actions
Change +3.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.1%
5.3%
4.3%
9.1%
5.3%
1.5%
2014: Alice
2.0%
5.9%
3.9%
12.7%
20.3%
2019: PEG
2.2%
2.0%
2.3%
2.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
8.9%
2025: August memo
12.1%
12.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 4, 2019 14/641,814 Reversed §103
Oct. 29, 2019 14/246,367 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Dec. 5, 2014 11/573,290 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 30, 2014 10/659,184 Affirmed N/A
May. 21, 2013 11/821,767 Affirmed §103
Apr. 18, 2013 10/919,671 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
Oct. 29, 2012 10/980,200 Reversed §103
Sep. 20, 2012 10/863,963 Reversed N/A
Nov. 21, 2011 10/709,006 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.