Examiner Martin Mushambo

Grant ratio: 79.1% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2674 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 79.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.78
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86783
Primary art unit
2674
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
841
Granted applications
665
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3390
Supervisor
Alicia Harrington
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2330

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 50.8% 1.90
Group 141 52.1% 1.79
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.80 1,514 office actions across 841 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 840 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 480 57.1%
2 OAs 193 22.9%
3 OAs 86 10.2%
4 OAs 41 4.9%
5+ OAs 40 4.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 18.2% 2009 2010: 62.1% 2010 2011: 73.9% 2011 2012: 70.5% 2012 2013: 63.2% 2013 2014: 91.4% 2014 2015: 88.1% 2015 2016: 84.5% 2016 2017: 81.1% 2017 2018: 91.2% 2018 2019: 89.8% 2019 2020: 95.7% 2020 2021: 97.5% 2021 2022: 97.5% 2022 2023: 95.1% 2023 2024: 85.2% 2024 2025: 55.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911218.2%
2010291862.1%
2011463473.9%
2012443170.5%
2013573663.2%
2014706491.4%
2015595288.1%
2016584984.5%
2017534381.1%
2018575291.2%
2019494489.8%
2020464495.7%
2021403997.5%
2022403997.5%
2023413995.1%
2024544685.2%
2025603355.0%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 840 10.1% 14.9% 58.2% 5.2%
Action 2 360 4.7% 10.0% 75.8% 6.4%
Action 3 167 3.0% 7.2% 82.0% 7.2%
Action 4 81 1.2% 4.9% 91.4% 1.2%
Action 5 40 5.0% 2.5% 92.5% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 8 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 12.5% 20 of 160 office actions
All years 7.3% 111 of 1,514 office actions
Change +5.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.2%
0.7%
1.2%
7.1%
2014: Alice
7.0%
2.1%
7.0%
11.0%
21.6%
2019: PEG
17.8%
13.3%
6.1%
4.3%
11.3%
2024: AI examples
12.3%
2025: August memo
17.2%
3.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 15, 2022 16/091,261 Affirmed §103
Feb. 1, 2021 15/786,266 Affirmed §101 · §112
Jun. 22, 2020 15/220,614 Reversed §103
Oct. 1, 2019 14/482,880 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2019 14/700,722 Affirmed §103
May. 12, 2016 11/646,023 Affirmed N/A
May. 18, 2015 11/895,893 Reversed N/A
Jul. 21, 2014 11/656,310 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.