Examiner Helen Q Zong

Grant ratio: 71.6% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 2677 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87835
Primary art unit
2677
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
758
Granted applications
543
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1600
Supervisor
Akwasi M. Sarpong
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3438

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 58.0% 1.74
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.99 1,505 office actions across 758 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 756 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 384 50.7%
2 OAs 164 21.6%
3 OAs 105 13.9%
4 OAs 68 9.0%
5+ OAs 35 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 84.2% 2011 2012: 64.4% 2012 2013: 67.4% 2013 2014: 52.5% 2014 2015: 75.0% 2015 2016: 89.3% 2016 2017: 88.9% 2017 2018: 93.5% 2018 2019: 88.2% 2019 2020: 70.0% 2020 2021: 85.7% 2021 2022: 77.4% 2022 2023: 82.0% 2023 2024: 77.8% 2024 2025: 51.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011191684.2%
2012452964.4%
2013463167.4%
2014402152.5%
2015523975.0%
2016565089.3%
2017544888.9%
2018464393.5%
2019514588.2%
2020503570.0%
2021423685.7%
2022624877.4%
2023615082.0%
2024272177.8%
2025603151.7%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 756 0.9% 3.7% 87.6% 1.9%
Action 2 372 0.0% 1.6% 95.7% 1.6%
Action 3 208 0.5% 1.0% 95.7% 2.9%
Action 4 103 0.0% 1.9% 98.1% 0.0%
Action 5 35 2.9% 5.7% 88.6% 2.9%
Action 6 18 0.0% 5.6% 88.9% 5.6%
Action 7 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 238 office actions
All years 0.6% 9 of 1,505 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.7%
0.0%
2.7%
3.2%
2.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 8, 2025 17/363,043 Affirmed in part §103
May. 17, 2021 14/818,371 Reversed §103
Jan. 30, 2018 13/845,902 Affirmed §103
Mar. 1, 2017 13/776,075 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 12, 2016 13/273,326 Affirmed §103
Jul. 19, 2016 12/798,562 Affirmed §103
Aug. 7, 2015 12/288,211 Affirmed §103
Jul. 7, 2015 12/251,836 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.