Examiner Seokyun Moon

Grant ratio: 61.7% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 2694 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2018
Grant ratio 61.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.64
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81662
Primary art unit
2694
Work group
2690
Technology center
2600
Applications
413
Granted applications
255

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 48.8% 2.24
Group 96 51.2% 2.11
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.60 1,164 office actions across 447 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 447 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 159 35.6%
2 OAs 123 27.5%
3 OAs 55 12.3%
4 OAs 49 11.0%
5+ OAs 61 13.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 35.7% 2008 2009: 55.9% 2009 2010: 43.8% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 57.6% 2012 2013: 55.8% 2013 2014: 63.4% 2014 2015: 56.7% 2015 2016: 86.0% 2016 2017: 88.4% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008421535.7%
2009341955.9%
2010321443.8%
2011402050.0%
2012331957.6%
2013432455.8%
2014412663.4%
2015301756.7%
2016504386.0%
2017433888.4%
2018252080.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 447 1.1% 5.4% 79.4% 4.5%
Action 2 288 0.3% 4.2% 87.5% 4.2%
Action 3 165 0.0% 1.2% 91.5% 3.0%
Action 4 110 0.0% 1.8% 93.6% 1.8%
Action 5 61 0.0% 1.6% 98.4% 0.0%
Action 6 35 0.0% 0.0% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 7 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 8 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.5% 6 of 1,164 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.4%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
29.4% 5/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
41.2% 7/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2017 13/432,775 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 30, 2016 13/213,210 Affirmed §103
Oct. 31, 2016 11/818,498 Affirmed §103
May. 23, 2016 11/980,721 Reversed §102 · §112
May. 12, 2016 12/264,166 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 25, 2015 11/956,031 Reversed N/A
Jun. 10, 2015 11/698,810 Reversed N/A
Jun. 5, 2015 10/924,172 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 27, 2015 11/818,335 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 21, 2015 11/581,126 Reversed N/A
Aug. 19, 2014 10/495,818 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 30, 2014 11/309,507 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.