Examiner Matthew Yeung

Grant ratio: 67.5% (78th percentile in Art Unit 2694 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.07. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.07
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86458
Primary art unit
2694
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
535
Granted applications
361
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4115
Supervisor
William Boddie
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0666

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 48.8% 2.24
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.08 1,115 office actions across 535 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 525 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.9%
1 OA 245 45.8%
2 OAs 132 24.7%
3 OAs 58 10.8%
4 OAs 50 9.3%
5+ OAs 40 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 40.6% 2009 2010: 68.4% 2010 2011: 45.5% 2011 2012: 100.0% 2012 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 55.0% 2015 2016: 25.8% 2016 2017: 65.0% 2017 2018: 71.4% 2018 2019: 71.4% 2019 2020: 86.0% 2020 2021: 90.5% 2021 2022: 88.5% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 90.0% 2024 2025: 53.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
2009321340.6%
2010382668.4%
2011221045.5%
201211100.0%
201411100.0%
2015201155.0%
201631825.8%
2017402665.0%
2018352571.4%
2019282071.4%
2020574986.0%
2021423890.5%
2022524688.5%
2023423685.7%
2024403690.0%
2025281553.6%
20262500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 525 1.0% 2.5% 92.4% 1.5%
Action 2 280 0.0% 2.1% 94.3% 1.1%
Action 3 148 0.0% 2.7% 94.6% 1.4%
Action 4 90 0.0% 0.0% 97.8% 2.2%
Action 5 40 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 153 office actions
All years 0.4% 5 of 1,115 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 19, 2025 18/299,000 Reversed §103
Mar. 16, 2018 14/307,866 Affirmed §103
Feb. 26, 2018 14/094,916 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.