Examiner Tszfung Chan

Grant ratio: 69.3% (24th percentile in Art Unit 2837 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.97. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.97
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86566
Primary art unit
2837
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
922
Granted applications
639
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7981
Supervisor
Shawki Ismail
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3985

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 63 70.6% 1.60
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.91 1,758 office actions across 922 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 921 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 411 44.6%
2 OAs 320 34.7%
3 OAs 99 10.7%
4 OAs 65 7.0%
5+ OAs 26 2.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 33.3% 2009 2010: 61.7% 2010 2011: 65.7% 2011 2012: 65.1% 2012 2013: 63.0% 2013 2014: 82.0% 2014 2015: 72.3% 2015 2016: 70.7% 2016 2017: 72.6% 2017 2018: 86.0% 2018 2019: 81.8% 2019 2020: 90.0% 2020 2021: 81.6% 2021 2022: 95.1% 2022 2023: 96.9% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 45.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009301033.3%
2010472961.7%
2011704665.7%
2012432865.1%
2013462963.0%
2014615082.0%
2015654772.3%
2016412970.7%
2017735372.6%
2018574986.0%
2019554581.8%
2020605490.0%
2021494081.6%
2022413995.1%
2023323196.9%
2024504080.0%
2025442045.5%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 921 0.0% 2.1% 88.2% 8.6%
Action 2 510 0.0% 2.0% 92.2% 5.5%
Action 3 190 0.0% 0.5% 95.8% 3.7%
Action 4 91 0.0% 0.0% 96.7% 2.2%
Action 5 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 242 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,758 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 27, 2019 13/571,381 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 15, 2017 13/673,748 Affirmed §103
Jan. 31, 2017 13/542,698 Affirmed §103
Dec. 23, 2014 12/370,208 Reversed §103
Nov. 12, 2014 12/876,595 Reversed N/A
Sep. 19, 2014 12/059,979 Reversed §103
Jul. 31, 2014 12/776,716 Affirmed in part N/A
Jan. 28, 2014 12/241,973 Reversed N/A
Feb. 8, 2013 11/639,725 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 24, 2012 11/630,586 Dismissed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.