Examiner Bickey Dhakal

Grant ratio: 74.8% (44th percentile in Art Unit 2837 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.65
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89840
Primary art unit
2837
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
782
Granted applications
585
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3577
Supervisor
Jessica Han
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2078

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 63 70.6% 1.60
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 1,300 office actions across 782 applications
Applications with office actions 98.7% 772 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.3%
1 OA 473 60.5%
2 OAs 167 21.4%
3 OAs 69 8.8%
4 OAs 40 5.1%
5+ OAs 23 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 78.4% 2013 2014: 93.0% 2014 2015: 86.1% 2015 2016: 72.6% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 77.8% 2018 2019: 93.3% 2019 2020: 85.9% 2020 2021: 96.2% 2021 2022: 92.9% 2022 2023: 78.9% 2023 2024: 89.8% 2024 2025: 39.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201211100.0%
2013514078.4%
2014575393.0%
2015363186.1%
2016735372.6%
2017604575.0%
2018544277.8%
2019302893.3%
2020716185.9%
2021535196.2%
2022565292.9%
2023574578.9%
2024595389.8%
2025763039.5%
20264800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 772 3.8% 8.7% 61.7% 23.2%
Action 2 299 1.3% 10.0% 75.6% 11.0%
Action 3 132 0.8% 6.1% 78.8% 13.6%
Action 4 63 0.0% 4.8% 84.1% 11.1%
Action 5 23 0.0% 8.7% 78.3% 13.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.4% 7 of 288 office actions
All years 2.6% 34 of 1,300 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
2.4%
1.8%
4.7%
2019: PEG
1.6%
3.8%
2.7%
8.4%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
4.4%
2025: August memo
0.9%
3.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
88.9% 8/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 2, 2022 16/592,054 Reversed §102
Mar. 23, 2022 15/711,151 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 10, 2020 15/437,714 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jun. 25, 2020 14/335,335 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 3, 2017 13/607,008 Reversed §103
Jun. 22, 2017 13/607,005 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 14, 2017 13/583,961 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Feb. 27, 2017 13/606,992 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jan. 4, 2017 13/607,013 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.