Examiner Zoheb S Imtiaz

Grant ratio: 69.4% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2846 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.61. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.61
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89730
Primary art unit
2846
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
504
Granted applications
350
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4308
Supervisor
Eduardo Colon Santana
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2060

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 3 69.7% 1.87
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.68 845 office actions across 504 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 504 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 312 61.9%
2 OAs 109 21.6%
3 OAs 43 8.5%
4 OAs 27 5.4%
5+ OAs 13 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 74.1% 2013 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 56.5% 2015 2016: 60.0% 2016 2017: 65.8% 2017 2018: 90.6% 2018 2019: 83.7% 2019 2020: 80.6% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021 2022: 96.9% 2022 2023: 85.0% 2023 2024: 87.3% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201211100.0%
2013272074.1%
2014211466.7%
2015231356.5%
2016352160.0%
2017382565.8%
2018322990.6%
2019494183.7%
2020362980.6%
2021242187.5%
2022323196.9%
2023403485.0%
2024554887.3%
2025462350.0%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 504 0.8% 16.1% 72.8% 6.9%
Action 2 192 1.6% 10.9% 84.9% 1.0%
Action 3 83 0.0% 4.8% 92.8% 0.0%
Action 4 40 2.5% 5.0% 87.5% 2.5%
Action 5 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 216 office actions
All years 0.9% 8 of 845 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.5%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 2, 2025 17/744,025 Reversed §103
Aug. 31, 2022 16/353,514 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 15, 2022 15/648,138 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 30, 2019 15/033,414 Reversed §103
Dec. 5, 2017 13/801,823 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.