Examiner Tuan T. Dinh

Grant ratio: 74.0% (48th percentile in Art Unit 2848 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.02. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.02
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77082
Primary art unit
2848
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,223
Granted applications
905
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1929
Supervisor
Timothy Dole
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2229

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 70.3% 1.70
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.05 2,502 office actions across 1,223 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 1,215 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 0.7%
1 OA 562 46.0%
2 OAs 345 28.2%
3 OAs 150 12.3%
4 OAs 80 6.5%
5+ OAs 78 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 64.0% 2008 2009: 67.2% 2009 2010: 82.3% 2010 2011: 74.7% 2011 2012: 80.3% 2012 2013: 72.9% 2013 2014: 82.6% 2014 2015: 65.5% 2015 2016: 68.0% 2016 2017: 81.1% 2017 2018: 81.1% 2018 2019: 85.0% 2019 2020: 79.7% 2020 2021: 81.7% 2021 2022: 87.0% 2022 2023: 90.6% 2023 2024: 88.9% 2024 2025: 63.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008754864.0%
2009644367.2%
2010796582.3%
2011795974.7%
2012665380.3%
2013705172.9%
2014695782.6%
2015553665.5%
2016755168.0%
2017534381.1%
2018746081.1%
2019605185.0%
2020594779.7%
2021604981.7%
2022544787.0%
2023645890.6%
2024544888.9%
2025613963.9%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,215 0.2% 20.2% 57.3% 0.7%
Action 2 653 0.2% 17.5% 66.2% 2.6%
Action 3 308 0.0% 9.4% 79.2% 2.9%
Action 4 158 0.0% 8.2% 77.8% 3.2%
Action 5 78 0.0% 7.7% 85.9% 1.3%
Action 6 40 0.0% 2.5% 87.5% 2.5%
Action 7 19 0.0% 0.0% 89.5% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.3% 1 of 311 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 2,502 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 27, 2019 13/515,306 Affirmed §103
Jul. 30, 2019 14/167,647 Reversed §103
Feb. 23, 2017 12/002,317 Reversed §102 · §112
Aug. 29, 2016 11/769,711 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 28, 2016 11/368,413 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 26, 2013 11/282,111 Reversed N/A
Mar. 4, 2013 11/145,900 Affirmed §103
Oct. 27, 2012 11/805,015 Reversed N/A
May. 18, 2010 10/853,456 Reversed §103
Dec. 4, 2009 11/168,175 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.