Examiner David M. Sinclair

Grant ratio: 63.1% (16th percentile in Art Unit 2848 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.20. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 63.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.20
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84450
Primary art unit
2848
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,300
Granted applications
820
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5068
Supervisor
Timothy Dole
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2229

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 70.3% 1.70
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 2,817 office actions across 1,300 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 1,288 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 0.9%
1 OA 475 36.5%
2 OAs 464 35.7%
3 OAs 153 11.8%
4 OAs 110 8.5%
5+ OAs 86 6.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 55.8% 2008 2009: 43.5% 2009 2010: 61.5% 2010 2011: 52.0% 2011 2012: 52.2% 2012 2013: 57.1% 2013 2014: 52.4% 2014 2015: 72.9% 2015 2016: 64.2% 2016 2017: 68.0% 2017 2018: 73.2% 2018 2019: 83.8% 2019 2020: 79.5% 2020 2021: 83.0% 2021 2022: 72.9% 2022 2023: 85.2% 2023 2024: 86.6% 2024 2025: 48.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200722100.0%
2008522955.8%
2009622743.5%
2010654061.5%
2011753952.0%
2012673552.2%
2013704057.1%
2014824352.4%
2015856272.9%
2016815264.2%
2017755168.0%
2018715273.2%
2019746283.8%
2020786279.5%
2021534483.0%
2022483572.9%
2023615285.2%
2024675886.6%
2025723548.6%
20266000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,288 1.5% 11.1% 72.5% 0.8%
Action 2 813 0.4% 6.2% 82.8% 0.9%
Action 3 349 0.0% 4.0% 87.4% 0.9%
Action 4 196 0.0% 3.1% 87.2% 1.0%
Action 5 86 0.0% 3.5% 84.9% 3.5%
Action 6 45 0.0% 0.0% 84.4% 6.7%
Action 7 16 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 18.8%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.3% 1 of 347 office actions
All years 0.8% 22 of 2,817 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
1.2%
0.5%
2019: PEG
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 5, 2026 18/430,573 Affirmed §103
Apr. 26, 2022 16/227,193 Affirmed §103
Feb. 2, 2022 16/156,708 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 8, 2021 15/866,385 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 20, 2015 12/002,616 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 17, 2015 12/678,684 Reversed N/A
Feb. 27, 2015 12/908,066 Reversed N/A
Feb. 26, 2013 11/662,406 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 26, 2012 11/994,068 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.