Examiner Arun Ramaswamy

Grant ratio: 75.7% (57th percentile in Art Unit 2848 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.91. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.91
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87557
Primary art unit
2848
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
839
Granted applications
635
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1962
Supervisor
Timothy Dole
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2229

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 70.3% 1.70
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.89 1,589 office actions across 839 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 839 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 419 49.9%
2 OAs 233 27.8%
3 OAs 101 12.0%
4 OAs 53 6.3%
5+ OAs 33 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 85.2% 2011 2012: 65.9% 2012 2013: 56.5% 2013 2014: 76.5% 2014 2015: 78.0% 2015 2016: 77.8% 2016 2017: 81.4% 2017 2018: 87.5% 2018 2019: 83.0% 2019 2020: 84.0% 2020 2021: 94.8% 2021 2022: 95.5% 2022 2023: 96.7% 2023 2024: 85.5% 2024 2025: 45.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011272385.2%
2012442965.9%
2013462656.5%
2014342676.5%
2015413278.0%
2016453577.8%
2017594881.4%
2018645687.5%
2019534483.0%
2020756384.0%
2021585594.8%
2022676495.5%
2023615996.7%
2024554785.5%
2025612845.9%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 839 0.2% 12.5% 84.3% 0.7%
Action 2 420 0.0% 11.2% 86.7% 1.7%
Action 3 187 0.0% 8.6% 89.3% 2.1%
Action 4 86 0.0% 14.0% 86.0% 0.0%
Action 5 33 0.0% 12.1% 87.9% 0.0%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 320 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,589 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2019: PEG
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 10, 2016 12/614,696 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.