Examiner Nathaniel Pelton

Grant ratio: 66.6% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2859 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.80. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.80
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87747
Primary art unit
2859
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
773
Granted applications
515
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1761
Supervisor
Julian Huffman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2147

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 45.9% 1.72
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 1,366 office actions across 773 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 769 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.5%
1 OA 424 54.9%
2 OAs 200 25.9%
3 OAs 76 9.8%
4 OAs 47 6.1%
5+ OAs 22 2.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 47.1% 2011 2012: 69.7% 2012 2013: 53.8% 2013 2014: 56.8% 2014 2015: 63.5% 2015 2016: 82.8% 2016 2017: 76.7% 2017 2018: 59.3% 2018 2019: 64.5% 2019 2020: 75.9% 2020 2021: 91.3% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 88.6% 2023 2024: 83.3% 2024 2025: 43.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201117847.1%
2012332369.7%
2013392153.8%
2014442556.8%
2015523363.5%
2016584882.8%
2017604676.7%
2018593559.3%
2019312064.5%
2020292275.9%
2021464291.3%
2022645687.5%
2023706288.6%
2024544583.3%
2025662943.9%
20265100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 769 0.5% 8.7% 81.1% 2.5%
Action 2 345 0.3% 4.6% 90.1% 1.7%
Action 3 145 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 1.4%
Action 4 69 0.0% 0.0% 94.2% 1.4%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 90.9% 4.5%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 278 office actions
All years 0.4% 5 of 1,366 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 12, 2022 16/249,059 Reversed §103
May. 21, 2019 14/357,840 Affirmed §103
Mar. 14, 2019 14/469,117 Reversed §101
Apr. 17, 2017 13/297,551 Reversed §103
Sep. 7, 2016 12/423,176 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.