Examiner Paul D. Lee

Grant ratio: 75.2% (84th percentile in Art Unit 2862 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.86. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.86
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87349
Primary art unit
2862
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
657
Granted applications
494
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1598
Supervisor
Arleen Vazquez
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2619

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 70.8% 1.97
Group 131 67.2% 1.82
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.78 1,169 office actions across 657 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 648 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 1.4%
1 OA 361 54.9%
2 OAs 170 25.9%
3 OAs 48 7.3%
4 OAs 41 6.2%
5+ OAs 28 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 36.8% 2011 2012: 68.1% 2012 2013: 81.1% 2013 2014: 73.5% 2014 2015: 79.7% 2015 2016: 83.8% 2016 2017: 78.7% 2017 2018: 85.5% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 86.7% 2020 2021: 89.4% 2021 2022: 96.7% 2022 2023: 85.0% 2023 2024: 94.7% 2024 2025: 66.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201119736.8%
2012473268.1%
2013373081.1%
2014493673.5%
2015594779.7%
2016373183.8%
2017473778.7%
2018554785.5%
2019221986.4%
2020453986.7%
2021474289.4%
2022302996.7%
2023403485.0%
2024383694.7%
2025422866.7%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 648 22.7% 12.5% 48.0% 14.2%
Action 2 287 28.9% 11.1% 53.0% 4.9%
Action 3 117 22.2% 6.0% 65.0% 3.4%
Action 4 69 20.3% 4.3% 69.6% 1.4%
Action 5 28 25.0% 3.6% 64.3% 3.6%
Action 6 15 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 41.7% 70 of 168 office actions
All years 24.0% 281 of 1,169 office actions
Change +17.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

50.0%
0.0%
1.1%
6.6%
6.6%
2014: Alice
20.3%
40.8%
23.5%
35.4%
59.5%
2019: PEG
11.5%
11.1%
0.0%
7.5%
29.2%
2024: AI examples
53.1%
2025: August memo
37.3%
45.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 23, 2020 13/745,714 Reversed §101
Feb. 25, 2020 14/585,675 Affirmed §101
Feb. 7, 2018 13/446,555 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 31, 2018 13/745,299 Affirmed §101
Aug. 16, 2016 13/071,724 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 17, 2016 12/477,508 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 6, 2014 12/197,748 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.