Examiner Douglas Kay

Grant ratio: 51.1% (35th percentile in Art Unit 2865 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.68. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 51.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.68
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92955
Primary art unit
2865
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
417
Granted applications
213
Examiner phone
(408) 918-7569
Supervisor
Arleen M Vazquez
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2619

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 11 57.6% 2.44
Group 130 66.9% 1.82
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.38 991 office actions across 417 applications
Applications with office actions 97.1% 405 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 2.9%
1 OA 140 33.6%
2 OAs 107 25.7%
3 OAs 76 18.2%
4 OAs 41 9.8%
5+ OAs 41 9.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 42.9% 2016 2017: 22.2% 2017 2018: 21.4% 2018 2019: 56.4% 2019 2020: 53.3% 2020 2021: 62.2% 2021 2022: 64.4% 2022 2023: 73.5% 2023 2024: 83.7% 2024 2025: 58.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20167342.9%
201727622.2%
201828621.4%
2019392256.4%
2020452453.3%
2021372362.2%
2022452964.4%
2023493673.5%
2024433683.7%
2025482858.3%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 405 8.9% 2.0% 76.0% 5.4%
Action 2 265 13.2% 1.1% 72.5% 9.1%
Action 3 158 13.3% 0.0% 72.2% 11.4%
Action 4 82 18.3% 0.0% 74.4% 4.9%
Action 5 41 12.2% 0.0% 73.2% 9.8%
Action 6 24 16.7% 0.0% 45.8% 20.8%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 15.2% 34 of 224 office actions
All years 11.7% 116 of 991 office actions
Change +3.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.0%
10.4%
2019: PEG
5.8%
9.9%
11.2%
13.7%
14.2%
2024: AI examples
16.4%
2025: August memo
13.9%
16.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 25, 2021 15/107,193 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.