Examiner Dustin Dickinson

Grant ratio: 74.4% (21st percentile in Art Unit 2867 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2022
Grant ratio 74.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89633
Primary art unit
2867
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
324
Granted applications
241

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 72.1% 1.63
Group 131 67.2% 1.82
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 754 office actions across 327 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 327 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 130 39.8%
2 OAs 90 27.5%
3 OAs 47 14.4%
4 OAs 29 8.9%
5+ OAs 31 9.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 69.4% 2014 2015: 65.8% 2015 2016: 63.6% 2016 2017: 68.6% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 82.1% 2019 2020: 81.8% 2020 2021: 93.8% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20125360.0%
2013211466.7%
2014362569.4%
2015382565.8%
2016332163.6%
2017352468.6%
2018403075.0%
2019393282.1%
2020443681.8%
2021323093.8%
202211100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 327 0.0% 1.8% 86.9% 9.8%
Action 2 197 1.0% 1.5% 84.3% 10.7%
Action 3 107 2.8% 0.9% 86.9% 8.4%
Action 4 60 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 8.3%
Action 5 31 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 3.2%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 11.8%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 5 of 754 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 4, 2022 15/709,739 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 21, 2020 14/467,069 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 24, 2018 14/890,648 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.