Examiner Thanh V. Pham

Grant ratio: 65.5% (19th percentile in Art Unit 2894 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.85. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2017
Grant ratio 65.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.85
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78040
Primary art unit
2894
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
328
Granted applications
215

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 68.5% 1.95
Group 288 53.7% 1.76
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.09 686 office actions across 328 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 328 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 149 45.4%
2 OAs 89 27.1%
3 OAs 42 12.8%
4 OAs 22 6.7%
5+ OAs 26 7.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.7% 2008 2009: 63.3% 2009 2010: 72.7% 2010 2011: 61.5% 2011 2012: 74.3% 2012 2013: 57.1% 2013 2014: 71.0% 2014 2015: 64.9% 2015 2016: 52.2% 2016 2017: 84.6% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008472961.7%
2009301963.3%
2010443272.7%
2011261661.5%
2012352674.3%
2013422457.1%
2014312271.0%
2015372464.9%
2016231252.2%
2017131184.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 328 1.5% 12.8% 79.9% 3.4%
Action 2 179 0.0% 7.3% 89.4% 1.1%
Action 3 90 0.0% 5.6% 90.0% 3.3%
Action 4 48 0.0% 0.0% 95.8% 4.2%
Action 5 26 0.0% 3.8% 84.6% 7.7%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 5 of 686 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
64.7% 11/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
64.7% 11/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 15, 2016 13/765,080 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 3, 2016 10/555,713 Affirmed §103
Jul. 22, 2015 12/255,828 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 27, 2015 12/153,519 Reversed N/A
Jul. 31, 2014 12/703,640 Reversed §103
Apr. 11, 2014 12/017,064 Reversed N/A
Mar. 21, 2014 10/926,916 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 19, 2013 12/142,094 Reversed §103
Oct. 29, 2013 12/322,118 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 20, 2013 11/755,019 Reversed N/A
Feb. 7, 2013 11/378,799 Reversed N/A
Sep. 26, 2012 11/531,793 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.