Examiner Joanne Silbermann

Grant ratio: 46.4% (19th percentile in Art Unit 3638 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.11. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2020
Grant ratio 46.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.11
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
68369
Primary art unit
3638
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
724
Granted applications
336

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 8 59.9% 1.81
Group 182 51.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.06 1,530 office actions across 743 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 743 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 294 39.6%
2 OAs 281 37.8%
3 OAs 72 9.7%
4 OAs 62 8.3%
5+ OAs 34 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 14.9% 2008 2009: 31.6% 2009 2010: 38.2% 2010 2011: 55.3% 2011 2012: 34.0% 2012 2013: 54.9% 2013 2014: 61.0% 2014 2015: 57.6% 2015 2016: 44.6% 2016 2017: 52.9% 2017 2018: 60.4% 2018 2019: 59.0% 2019 2020: 53.1% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008671014.9%
2009571831.6%
2010762938.2%
2011382155.3%
2012531834.0%
2013512854.9%
2014593661.0%
2015663857.6%
2016652944.6%
2017512752.9%
2018482960.4%
2019613659.0%
2020321753.1%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 743 0.3% 8.7% 86.3% 3.9%
Action 2 449 0.4% 6.5% 86.0% 5.8%
Action 3 168 0.0% 8.3% 85.1% 6.0%
Action 4 96 0.0% 10.4% 78.1% 10.4%
Action 5 34 0.0% 8.8% 85.3% 5.9%
Action 6 17 0.0% 11.8% 88.2% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,530 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
5.9% 1/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
23.5% 4/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 3, 2021 15/170,960 Affirmed §103
Jun. 11, 2021 16/027,148 Affirmed §103
Oct. 21, 2020 14/213,468 Affirmed §103
Jul. 31, 2020 15/345,892 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Sep. 6, 2019 15/284,133 Affirmed §103
Apr. 10, 2018 13/358,712 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Mar. 26, 2018 14/636,769 Affirmed §103
Aug. 29, 2017 13/837,899 Affirmed §103
Feb. 22, 2017 13/614,149 Affirmed §103
Feb. 21, 2017 12/974,178 Affirmed §103
Jan. 31, 2017 13/066,208 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 13, 2016 13/661,193 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.