Examiner Luke D Ratcliffe

Grant ratio: 82.9% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 3645 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 82.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.56
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81432
Primary art unit
3645
Work group
3640
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,740
Granted applications
1,442
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3110
Supervisor
Isam Alsomiri
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6970

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 51 38.2% 1.62
Group 280 52.3% 1.75
Tech Center 2,394 45.5% 2.12
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.51 2,635 office actions across 1,740 applications
Applications with office actions 98.5% 1,714 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 26 1.5%
1 OA 1,149 66.0%
2 OAs 349 20.1%
3 OAs 128 7.4%
4 OAs 57 3.3%
5+ OAs 31 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 76.2% 2008 2009: 82.7% 2009 2010: 87.5% 2010 2011: 84.7% 2011 2012: 80.9% 2012 2013: 91.4% 2013 2014: 87.6% 2014 2015: 93.1% 2015 2016: 93.2% 2016 2017: 88.8% 2017 2018: 90.2% 2018 2019: 86.3% 2019 2020: 92.8% 2020 2021: 93.8% 2021 2022: 96.1% 2022 2023: 91.4% 2023 2024: 82.5% 2024 2025: 44.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008634876.2%
20091048682.7%
2010968487.5%
2011857284.7%
20121159380.9%
201312811791.4%
2014897887.6%
2015726793.1%
2016736893.2%
201712511188.8%
20181029290.2%
201911710186.3%
2020979092.8%
2021979193.8%
2022767396.1%
2023817491.4%
2024806682.5%
2025703144.3%
20267000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,714 1.4% 6.9% 73.8% 12.5%
Action 2 565 0.5% 4.4% 88.8% 1.9%
Action 3 216 0.0% 5.1% 89.8% 3.2%
Action 4 88 0.0% 3.4% 93.2% 1.1%
Action 5 31 0.0% 0.0% 90.3% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 285 office actions
All years 1.0% 27 of 2,635 office actions
Change -0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
1.6%
1.3%
2014: Alice
4.2%
3.4%
1.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.7%
1.3%
2.1%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 21, 2018 13/937,636 Affirmed §103
Jan. 14, 2016 11/996,530 Reversed §103
Aug. 31, 2015 11/177,782 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 19, 2015 12/278,312 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 15, 2014 12/106,560 Affirmed §103
Jul. 30, 2013 11/582,150 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 19, 2012 11/569,884 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.