Examiner Timothy Pham

Grant ratio: 81.9% (76th percentile in Art Unit 3648 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 81.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85483
Primary art unit
3648
Work group
3640
Technology center
3600
Applications
981
Granted applications
803
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7115
Supervisor
Vladimir Magloire
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5144

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 49 51.9% 1.69
Group 281 52.9% 1.75
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.90 1,861 office actions across 981 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 979 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 539 54.9%
2 OAs 228 23.2%
3 OAs 95 9.7%
4 OAs 54 5.5%
5+ OAs 63 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 25.0% 2008 2009: 48.4% 2009 2010: 61.2% 2010 2011: 79.2% 2011 2012: 83.7% 2012 2013: 98.2% 2013 2014: 90.0% 2014 2015: 80.4% 2015 2016: 88.7% 2016 2017: 86.9% 2017 2018: 85.5% 2018 2019: 97.4% 2019 2020: 91.0% 2020 2021: 87.7% 2021 2022: 98.1% 2022 2023: 88.2% 2023 2024: 90.6% 2024 2025: 58.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20084125.0%
2009311548.4%
2010493061.2%
2011483879.2%
2012494183.7%
2013555498.2%
2014605490.0%
2015514180.4%
2016534788.7%
2017615386.9%
2018695985.5%
2019787697.4%
2020787191.0%
2021575087.7%
2022525198.1%
2023514588.2%
2024534890.6%
2025502958.0%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 979 3.1% 9.7% 76.4% 3.6%
Action 2 440 1.1% 7.7% 80.9% 4.5%
Action 3 212 0.9% 5.7% 84.9% 5.7%
Action 4 117 0.0% 6.0% 88.0% 0.9%
Action 5 63 1.6% 11.1% 77.8% 7.9%
Action 6 28 0.0% 10.7% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.9% 7 of 180 office actions
All years 2.0% 38 of 1,861 office actions
Change +1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
1.7%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.7%
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.2%
2019: PEG
7.6%
6.9%
3.5%
0.0%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
3.2%
2025: August memo
5.2%
2.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
34.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2015 11/493,720 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.