Examiner Patrick Cicchino

Grant ratio: 73.2% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 3653 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.92. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 73.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.92
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84194
Primary art unit
3653
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
840
Granted applications
615
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1954
Supervisor
Anita Coupe
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3614

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 63.6% 1.91
Group 261 55.1% 1.70
Tech Center 2,394 45.5% 2.12
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.93 1,617 office actions across 840 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 839 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 387 46.1%
2 OAs 270 32.1%
3 OAs 95 11.3%
4 OAs 53 6.3%
5+ OAs 34 4.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 47.6% 2008 2009: 69.6% 2009 2010: 72.0% 2010 2011: 80.9% 2011 2012: 84.1% 2012 2013: 90.9% 2013 2014: 91.1% 2014 2015: 93.5% 2015 2016: 79.5% 2016 2017: 75.4% 2017 2018: 88.0% 2018 2019: 79.7% 2019 2020: 82.4% 2020 2021: 87.8% 2021 2022: 70.8% 2022 2023: 82.1% 2023 2024: 69.6% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008211047.6%
2009563969.6%
2010503672.0%
2011685580.9%
2012443784.1%
2013444090.9%
2014454191.1%
2015464393.5%
2016393179.5%
2017614675.4%
2018504488.0%
2019594779.7%
2020342882.4%
2021413687.8%
2022241770.8%
2023282382.1%
2024231669.6%
2025522650.0%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 839 0.2% 21.2% 70.4% 6.7%
Action 2 452 0.4% 14.2% 74.1% 9.1%
Action 3 182 0.5% 12.6% 79.7% 6.0%
Action 4 87 1.1% 13.8% 82.8% 2.3%
Action 5 34 0.0% 14.7% 76.5% 5.9%
Action 6 16 0.0% 6.3% 87.5% 6.3%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 204 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,617 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.9%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 2, 2020 15/158,957 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Mar. 23, 2017 13/407,871 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 22, 2014 11/960,324 Reversed N/A
Jul. 15, 2014 11/972,514 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 26, 2013 11/932,156 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 31, 2012 11/047,040 Reversed N/A
Jul. 25, 2012 11/974,844 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 6, 2012 11/583,415 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.