Examiner Adam D Rogers

Grant ratio: 76.5% (86th percentile in Art Unit 3656 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.77. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.77
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87469
Primary art unit
3656
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,423
Granted applications
1,089
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6561
Supervisor
John Olszewski
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2706

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 49.7% 1.66
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.75 2,496 office actions across 1,423 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 1,416 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 0.5%
1 OA 730 51.3%
2 OAs 458 32.2%
3 OAs 139 9.8%
4 OAs 46 3.2%
5+ OAs 43 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 51.0% 2011 2012: 62.5% 2012 2013: 76.7% 2013 2014: 77.1% 2014 2015: 81.5% 2015 2016: 80.7% 2016 2017: 80.2% 2017 2018: 85.2% 2018 2019: 88.8% 2019 2020: 84.0% 2020 2021: 87.1% 2021 2022: 86.9% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 88.1% 2024 2025: 60.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011512651.0%
2012563562.5%
2013735676.7%
2014836477.1%
2015816681.5%
20161098880.7%
20171169380.2%
20181089285.2%
2019988788.8%
20201068984.0%
2021938187.1%
2022998686.9%
20231129887.5%
2024847488.1%
2025895460.7%
20266500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,416 0.1% 8.5% 41.5% 48.7%
Action 2 686 0.3% 11.8% 54.7% 31.5%
Action 3 228 0.4% 8.3% 72.8% 16.7%
Action 4 89 0.0% 5.6% 74.2% 20.2%
Action 5 43 0.0% 0.0% 81.4% 16.3%
Action 6 22 0.0% 4.5% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.3% 1 of 396 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 2,496 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 25, 2021 16/717,611 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jul. 21, 2020 15/035,396 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 26, 2019 15/493,708 Reversed §103 · §112
Jun. 28, 2019 14/477,313 Affirmed §103
Oct. 26, 2016 13/116,142 Reversed §102
Jun. 22, 2016 13/166,908 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.