Examiner William C. Joyce

Grant ratio: 65.5% (65th percentile in Art Unit 3658 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74465
Primary art unit
3658
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,259
Granted applications
825
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7107
Supervisor
Minnah Seoh
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7778

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 55.6% 1.69
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.84 2,312 office actions across 1,259 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,254 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.4%
1 OA 649 51.5%
2 OAs 363 28.8%
3 OAs 125 9.9%
4 OAs 69 5.5%
5+ OAs 48 3.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.6% 2008 2009: 44.7% 2009 2010: 62.2% 2010 2011: 74.1% 2011 2012: 73.3% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 70.6% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 67.2% 2016 2017: 73.8% 2017 2018: 77.6% 2018 2019: 72.7% 2019 2020: 72.1% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 73.5% 2022 2023: 89.3% 2023 2024: 87.2% 2024 2025: 45.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008854350.6%
2009944244.7%
2010905662.2%
2011816074.1%
2012866373.3%
2013785266.7%
2014684870.6%
2015553360.0%
2016614167.2%
2017614573.8%
2018584577.6%
2019664872.7%
2020684972.1%
2021544787.0%
2022493673.5%
2023565089.3%
2024474187.2%
2025572645.6%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,254 0.1% 17.2% 62.0% 18.5%
Action 2 605 0.2% 15.2% 72.4% 11.2%
Action 3 242 0.0% 10.3% 77.3% 11.2%
Action 4 117 0.0% 9.4% 75.2% 12.8%
Action 5 48 0.0% 8.3% 79.2% 6.3%
Action 6 29 0.0% 3.4% 69.0% 24.1%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 281 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 2,312 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 31, 2020 15/281,662 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 13, 2016 11/693,871 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Nov. 17, 2015 10/556,883 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Apr. 29, 2015 12/133,781 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 28, 2014 12/318,129 Affirmed §103
Nov. 25, 2013 10/516,142 Reversed §102 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.