Examiner Ian Jen

Grant ratio: 74.9% (81st percentile in Art Unit 3664 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.98. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.98
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83888
Primary art unit
3664
Work group
3660
Technology center
3600
Applications
762
Granted applications
571
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3274
Supervisor
Abby Lin
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3976

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 73 59.7% 1.71
Group 454 54.1% 1.86
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.97 1,499 office actions across 762 applications
Applications with office actions 98.3% 749 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 13 1.7%
1 OA 315 41.3%
2 OAs 265 34.8%
3 OAs 64 8.4%
4 OAs 80 10.5%
5+ OAs 25 3.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 39.4% 2008 2009: 60.4% 2009 2010: 70.0% 2010 2011: 77.8% 2011 2012: 83.3% 2012 2013: 79.5% 2013 2014: 81.8% 2014 2015: 94.3% 2015 2016: 88.2% 2016 2017: 92.9% 2017 2018: 91.3% 2018 2019: 88.4% 2019 2020: 82.6% 2020 2021: 91.3% 2021 2022: 82.8% 2022 2023: 86.1% 2023 2024: 70.4% 2024 2025: 28.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008331339.4%
2009533260.4%
2010503570.0%
2011362877.8%
2012665583.3%
2013443579.5%
2014443681.8%
2015353394.3%
2016514588.2%
2017423992.9%
2018232191.3%
2019433888.4%
2020463882.6%
2021464291.3%
2022292482.8%
2023363186.1%
2024271970.4%
202525728.0%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 749 1.7% 30.4% 51.8% 9.9%
Action 2 434 1.4% 22.6% 70.7% 3.2%
Action 3 169 0.6% 10.1% 83.4% 3.0%
Action 4 105 0.0% 5.7% 88.6% 3.8%
Action 5 25 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 63.6% 18.2%
Action 7 5 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.9% 5 of 171 office actions
All years 1.4% 21 of 1,499 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.7%
0.7%
0.0%
1.2%
1.8%
1.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
1.7%
9.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.2%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.3%
2025: August memo
2.1%
4.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 6/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 21, 2021 15/562,243 Reversed §103
Nov. 30, 2012 10/917,044 Reversed N/A
Nov. 23, 2012 10/528,180 Reversed §103
Jul. 19, 2012 10/822,199 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 9, 2012 11/519,400 Reversed §103
Nov. 22, 2011 11/067,181 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.