Examiner Adam Mott

Grant ratio: 73.2% (78th percentile in Art Unit 3669 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.67. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 73.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.67
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88828
Primary art unit
3669
Work group
3660
Technology center
3600
Applications
313
Granted applications
229
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5376
Supervisor
James Trammell
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6712

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 55 56.5% 1.85
Group 454 54.1% 1.86
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.76 551 office actions across 313 applications
Applications with office actions 97.8% 306 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 2.2%
1 OA 164 52.4%
2 OAs 85 27.2%
3 OAs 32 10.2%
4 OAs 14 4.5%
5+ OAs 11 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 83.3% 2012 2013: 61.8% 2013 2014: 82.6% 2014 2015: 80.6% 2015 2016: 70.0% 2016 2017: 87.5% 2017 2018: 86.5% 2018 2019: 76.3% 2019 2020: 65.7% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012121083.3%
2013342161.8%
2014231982.6%
2015312580.6%
2016402870.0%
2017403587.5%
2018373286.5%
2019382976.3%
2020352365.7%
20216466.7%
202233100.0%
2024100.0%
2025300.0%
20261000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 306 2.3% 6.5% 78.8% 7.2%
Action 2 142 0.7% 8.5% 79.6% 4.9%
Action 3 57 0.0% 3.5% 89.5% 3.5%
Action 4 25 0.0% 4.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 5 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 19 office actions
All years 1.5% 8 of 551 office actions
Change -1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.6%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
1.3%
3.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
6.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 1, 2021 15/798,719 Affirmed §103
Apr. 27, 2018 14/499,476 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.