Examiner William Kelleher

Grant ratio: 47.1% (30th percentile in Art Unit 3673 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.08. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: May 2026
Grant ratio 47.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.08
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83305
Primary art unit
3673
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
416
Granted applications
196

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 52.8% 1.84
Group 238 58.8% 1.84
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.02 839 office actions across 416 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 416 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 185 44.5%
2 OAs 130 31.3%
3 OAs 44 10.6%
4 OAs 35 8.4%
5+ OAs 22 5.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 29.6% 2008 2009: 41.3% 2009 2010: 49.2% 2010 2011: 53.1% 2011 2012: 70.0% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 50.0% 2014 2015: 5.3% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008541629.6%
2009461941.3%
2010613049.2%
2011643453.1%
2012704970.0%
2013422866.7%
2014381950.0%
20151915.3%
20161200.0%
2017200.0%
2025500.0%
2026300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 416 0.0% 5.8% 83.2% 4.6%
Action 2 231 0.0% 5.6% 87.4% 3.0%
Action 3 101 0.0% 7.9% 87.1% 2.0%
Action 4 57 0.0% 1.8% 91.2% 5.3%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 90.9% 4.5%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 12 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 839 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
43.8% 7/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
62.5% 10/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 19, 2016 13/194,796 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2016 12/599,049 Reversed §103
Nov. 28, 2016 12/966,964 Reversed §103 · §112
Aug. 31, 2016 11/571,749 Affirmed §102
Jan. 7, 2016 12/706,940 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 22, 2015 13/054,711 Reversed N/A
Sep. 9, 2014 12/428,667 Reversed §103
Dec. 11, 2013 11/780,119 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2013 11/164,314 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 26, 2013 11/679,399 Affirmed in part §103
May. 31, 2013 11/366,809 Reversed N/A
Dec. 18, 2012 11/042,271 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.