Examiner Daniel M. Sorkowitz

Grant ratio: 16.8% (55th percentile in Art Unit 3681 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 16.8%
Average office actions / grant 4.36
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84985
Primary art unit
3681
Work group
3680
Technology center
3600
Applications
315
Granted applications
53

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 16.3% 3.12
Group 285 28.7% 2.80
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 4.00 1,324 office actions across 331 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 331 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 79 23.9%
2 OAs 49 14.8%
3 OAs 36 10.9%
4 OAs 48 14.5%
5+ OAs 119 36.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 35.3% 2009 2010: 54.5% 2010 2011: 21.1% 2011 2012: 5.6% 2012 2013: 35.7% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 9.7% 2015 2016: 12.8% 2016 2017: 21.4% 2017 2018: 14.8% 2018 2019: 7.5% 2019 2020: 15.4% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008800.0%
200917635.3%
201011654.5%
201119421.1%
20121815.6%
2013281035.7%
20142200.0%
20153139.7%
201639512.8%
201742921.4%
201827414.8%
20194037.5%
202013215.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 331 1.8% 19.3% 78.2% 0.6%
Action 2 252 4.0% 15.5% 79.4% 0.8%
Action 3 203 9.4% 12.8% 77.3% 0.0%
Action 4 167 11.4% 9.6% 77.8% 0.6%
Action 5 119 16.0% 3.4% 77.3% 2.5%
Action 6 89 14.6% 4.5% 76.4% 3.4%
Action 7 57 15.8% 3.5% 80.7% 0.0%
Action 8 42 19.0% 0.0% 81.0% 0.0%
Action 9 26 26.9% 0.0% 69.2% 3.8%
Action 10 16 0.0% 6.3% 87.5% 6.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 8.3% 110 of 1,324 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.8%
1.8%
2014: Alice
10.4%
20.0%
21.5%
17.4%
9.9%
2019: PEG
5.9%
9.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 41. Merits outcomes: 22 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 14 reversed.

Full reversal rate
34.1% 14/41 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
46.3% 19/41 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.0 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 3, 2020 14/939,591 Affirmed §101 · §103
Oct. 7, 2020 14/180,494 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Aug. 25, 2020 14/933,153 Affirmed §101
Jun. 11, 2020 13/282,322 Affirmed §101
Mar. 27, 2020 12/189,225 Affirmed §101
Mar. 9, 2020 13/570,420 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §112
Jan. 3, 2020 13/126,810 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 30, 2019 11/692,963 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 4, 2019 12/115,706 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 3, 2019 12/325,471 Affirmed §101
Aug. 6, 2019 12/536,451 Affirmed §101
Jun. 27, 2019 10/743,520 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.