Examiner Michael Goldman

Grant ratio: 15.9% (16th percentile in Art Unit 3682 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2015
Grant ratio 15.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.25
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84475
Primary art unit
3682
Work group
3680
Technology center
3600
Applications
151
Granted applications
24

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 41.4% 2.60
Group 285 28.7% 2.80
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.54 383 office actions across 151 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 151 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 48 31.8%
2 OAs 45 29.8%
3 OAs 26 17.2%
4 OAs 18 11.9%
5+ OAs 14 9.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 5.0% 2008 2009: 29.4% 2009 2010: 28.6% 2010 2011: 5.3% 2011 2012: 12.5% 2012 2013: 12.5% 2013 2014: 9.5% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20082015.0%
2009341029.4%
201021628.6%
20111915.3%
201216212.5%
201316212.5%
20142129.5%
2015400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 151 0.0% 21.9% 77.5% 0.0%
Action 2 103 0.0% 15.5% 83.5% 1.0%
Action 3 58 0.0% 8.6% 91.4% 0.0%
Action 4 32 0.0% 3.1% 93.8% 3.1%
Action 5 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 383 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
80.0% 8/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 8/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 21, 2013 11/012,055 Reversed N/A
Dec. 11, 2012 10/612,518 Reversed N/A
Oct. 30, 2012 11/170,727 Reversed §103
Sep. 25, 2012 10/639,811 Reversed §103
May. 16, 2012 10/997,521 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Feb. 27, 2012 11/857,440 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jan. 9, 2012 10/317,354 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 15, 2011 10/875,726 Reversed §103
Aug. 3, 2011 11/244,467 Reversed §102
Dec. 17, 2009 11/750,064 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.