Examiner Daniel Lastra

Grant ratio: 50.1% (80th percentile in Art Unit 3688 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.55. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2016
Grant ratio 50.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.55
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77929
Primary art unit
3688
Work group
3680
Technology center
3600
Applications
411
Granted applications
206

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 28.6% 2.66
Group 285 28.7% 2.80
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.25 925 office actions across 411 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 411 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 163 39.7%
2 OAs 113 27.5%
3 OAs 63 15.3%
4 OAs 40 9.7%
5+ OAs 32 7.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 4.8% 2008 2009: 23.5% 2009 2010: 42.4% 2010 2011: 68.3% 2011 2012: 83.3% 2012 2013: 91.1% 2013 2014: 55.9% 2014 2015: 23.7% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20084224.8%
2009511223.5%
2010592542.4%
2011634368.3%
2012665583.3%
2013454191.1%
2014341955.9%
201538923.7%
20161300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 411 1.5% 52.8% 37.5% 0.5%
Action 2 248 5.2% 34.7% 56.9% 0.4%
Action 3 135 5.2% 25.2% 65.2% 0.0%
Action 4 72 6.9% 18.1% 73.6% 0.0%
Action 5 32 9.4% 12.5% 65.6% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 3.7% 34 of 925 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
3.0%
2014: Alice
31.3%
18.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 28. Merits outcomes: 14 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
32.1% 9/28 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 14/28 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.8 months
New grounds of rejection
4
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 28, 2015 10/071,442 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Aug. 4, 2014 10/365,703 Affirmed §103
Dec. 3, 2013 10/513,288 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Aug. 26, 2013 10/301,608 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 5, 2013 10/676,848 Affirmed §103
Jun. 25, 2013 09/818,400 Affirmed in part §102
May. 23, 2013 10/401,504 Reversed N/A
May. 14, 2013 10/700,686 Reversed N/A
Apr. 30, 2013 10/135,884 Reversed §102
Apr. 30, 2013 10/218,107 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 23, 2013 10/154,008 Reversed N/A
Mar. 25, 2013 11/549,734 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.