Examiner Jeffrey G. Hoekstra

Grant ratio: 45.0% (30th percentile in Art Unit 3736 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §102.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 45.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81761
Primary art unit
3736
Work group
3730
Technology center
3700
Applications
580
Granted applications
261
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7232
Supervisor
Charles A. Marmor Ii
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4730

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 51.5% 2.19
Group 289 50.3% 2.22
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 1,147 office actions across 580 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 576 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.7%
1 OA 238 41.0%
2 OAs 208 35.9%
3 OAs 64 11.0%
4 OAs 42 7.2%
5+ OAs 24 4.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.1% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 74.5% 2010 2011: 71.9% 2011 2012: 57.1% 2012 2013: 25.0% 2013 2014: 8.3% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2019: 75.0% 2019 2025: 19.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008634165.1%
2009804860.0%
20101067974.5%
2011644671.9%
2012563257.1%
20134125.0%
20142428.3%
20151000.0%
20163000.0%
20194375.0%
202546919.6%
20269300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 576 2.8% 57.5% 36.1% 3.6%
Action 2 338 3.0% 47.0% 45.6% 3.6%
Action 3 130 1.5% 32.3% 63.1% 2.3%
Action 4 66 3.0% 28.8% 60.6% 4.5%
Action 5 24 0.0% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 18.2% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.5% 7 of 202 office actions
All years 2.6% 30 of 1,147 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.5%
0.0%
0.5%
5.8%
2.4%
11.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
7.5%
5.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
18.2%
2025: August memo
1.1%
5.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 19. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
41.2% 7/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
41.2% 7/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 22, 2017 13/944,734 Affirmed §103
Jun. 14, 2017 12/296,754 Affirmed §103
Aug. 29, 2016 13/337,987 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 16, 2016 10/630,883 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 16, 2015 11/999,610 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 9, 2015 12/514,472 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 7, 2015 11/876,535 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 12, 2012 10/734,671 Affirmed §102
Aug. 22, 2012 10/494,584 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Aug. 21, 2012 12/351,414 Reversed §102
Aug. 17, 2012 11/998,692 Reversed §102
Apr. 23, 2012 11/523,172 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.