Examiner Gregory A Anderson

Grant ratio: 75.4% (84th percentile in Art Unit 3773 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: May 2020
Grant ratio 75.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84016
Primary art unit
3773
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
617
Granted applications
465

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 60.0% 2.35
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.45 1,564 office actions across 638 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 638 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 227 35.6%
2 OAs 197 30.9%
3 OAs 84 13.2%
4 OAs 57 8.9%
5+ OAs 73 11.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 48.5% 2008 2009: 70.6% 2009 2010: 61.5% 2010 2011: 61.2% 2011 2012: 76.7% 2012 2013: 79.7% 2013 2014: 85.0% 2014 2015: 78.4% 2015 2016: 78.6% 2016 2017: 84.1% 2017 2018: 84.1% 2018 2019: 83.9% 2019 2020: 93.8% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008331648.5%
2009513670.6%
2010392461.5%
2011674161.2%
2012604676.7%
2013796379.7%
2014605185.0%
2015514078.4%
2016423378.6%
2017443784.1%
2018443784.1%
2019312683.9%
2020161593.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 638 0.6% 13.2% 70.1% 0.3%
Action 2 411 0.5% 10.0% 78.8% 1.7%
Action 3 214 0.0% 7.0% 86.9% 2.3%
Action 4 130 0.0% 5.4% 86.2% 1.5%
Action 5 73 0.0% 5.5% 90.4% 2.7%
Action 6 52 0.0% 1.9% 88.5% 1.9%
Action 7 23 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 8.3% 91.7% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,564 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
1.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
38.5% 5/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
76.9% 10/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 26, 2020 13/935,632 Affirmed §103
Sep. 1, 2016 11/869,941 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Aug. 26, 2016 12/203,245 Affirmed in part §100 · §102 · §103
Mar. 15, 2016 12/722,860 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Dec. 16, 2015 11/015,297 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 22, 2015 11/899,852 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 31, 2015 12/352,937 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 20, 2015 10/927,601 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 6, 2014 10/781,582 Reversed §103
May. 22, 2013 11/238,543 Reversed N/A
Sep. 17, 2012 11/093,662 Affirmed §103
Jul. 30, 2012 12/370,576 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.