Examiner Cameron J. Allen

Grant ratio: 74.7% (75th percentile in Art Unit 1774 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2025
Grant ratio 74.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83841
Primary art unit
1774
Work group
1770
Technology center
1700
Applications
910
Granted applications
680

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 56.3% 1.86
Group 178 50.9% 1.94
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.68 1,583 office actions across 942 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 942 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 552 58.6%
2 OAs 241 25.6%
3 OAs 90 9.6%
4 OAs 34 3.6%
5+ OAs 25 2.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 48.4% 2008 2009: 71.2% 2009 2010: 88.1% 2010 2011: 53.1% 2011 2012: 59.7% 2012 2013: 58.7% 2013 2014: 62.5% 2014 2015: 77.4% 2015 2016: 77.4% 2016 2017: 86.5% 2017 2018: 75.9% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 94.0% 2020 2021: 80.3% 2021 2022: 78.2% 2022 2023: 78.9% 2023 2024: 78.5% 2024 2025: 66.7% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008311548.4%
2009523771.2%
2010423788.1%
2011321753.1%
2012674059.7%
2013462758.7%
2014483062.5%
2015534177.4%
2016624877.4%
2017524586.5%
2018544175.9%
2019605083.3%
2020504794.0%
2021614980.3%
2022554378.2%
2023715678.9%
2024655178.5%
20259666.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 942 1.0% 10.7% 68.0% 14.9%
Action 2 390 0.5% 7.4% 73.3% 13.6%
Action 3 149 0.0% 7.4% 75.8% 13.4%
Action 4 59 0.0% 5.1% 74.6% 15.3%
Action 5 25 0.0% 4.0% 80.0% 16.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 72.7% 9.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 176 office actions
All years 0.7% 11 of 1,583 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.9%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
0.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2016 12/227,395 Affirmed §103
Dec. 10, 2015 12/279,530 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 28, 2015 11/831,187 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 15, 2015 12/634,003 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Jul. 8, 2014 11/292,328 Affirmed §103
Oct. 31, 2013 12/236,801 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.