Examiner Amber Orlando

Grant ratio: 62.4% (35th percentile in Art Unit 1776 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.91. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 62.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.91
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83821
Primary art unit
1776
Work group
1770
Technology center
1700
Applications
686
Granted applications
428
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3149
Supervisor
Alexa Neckel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2450

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 59.1% 1.68
Group 179 50.3% 1.94
Tech Center 1,816 43.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.89 1,298 office actions across 686 applications
Applications with office actions 96.6% 663 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 23 3.4%
1 OA 296 43.1%
2 OAs 223 32.5%
3 OAs 69 10.1%
4 OAs 50 7.3%
5+ OAs 25 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 60.5% 2008 2009: 58.5% 2009 2010: 57.6% 2010 2011: 53.6% 2011 2012: 69.0% 2012 2013: 80.5% 2013 2014: 80.6% 2014 2015: 75.0% 2015 2016: 81.1% 2016 2017: 54.1% 2017 2018: 62.5% 2018 2019: 71.9% 2019 2020: 32.1% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008432660.5%
2009533158.5%
2010663857.6%
2011563053.6%
2012714969.0%
2013826680.5%
2014625080.6%
2015483675.0%
2016373081.1%
2017372054.1%
2018322062.5%
2019322371.9%
202028932.1%
2021700.0%
20251100.0%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 663 0.2% 6.0% 79.3% 2.4%
Action 2 367 0.0% 5.7% 86.1% 1.6%
Action 3 144 0.0% 5.6% 82.6% 4.2%
Action 4 75 0.0% 6.7% 80.0% 5.3%
Action 5 25 0.0% 4.0% 84.0% 4.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 76.9% 7.7%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 41 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,298 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 31, 2016 13/476,386 Affirmed §103
Mar. 23, 2016 13/385,240 Affirmed §103
Aug. 17, 2015 13/248,622 Affirmed N/A
May. 10, 2013 11/091,737 Reversed N/A
Sep. 28, 2012 11/557,150 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 11, 2012 12/184,795 Affirmed §103
Jun. 1, 2011 11/145,205 Affirmed §103
Jan. 27, 2011 10/521,884 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.