Examiner Alexis B Pacheco

Grant ratio: 71.2% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2859 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.67. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.67
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81008
Primary art unit
2859
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,059
Granted applications
754
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5979
Supervisor
Julian Huffman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2147

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 45.9% 1.72
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.67 1,767 office actions across 1,059 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 1,049 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 0.9%
1 OA 556 52.5%
2 OAs 370 34.9%
3 OAs 60 5.7%
4 OAs 39 3.7%
5+ OAs 24 2.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 58.8% 2008 2009: 68.5% 2009 2010: 73.7% 2010 2011: 73.8% 2011 2012: 70.7% 2012 2013: 68.1% 2013 2014: 72.1% 2014 2015: 72.2% 2015 2016: 68.8% 2016 2017: 77.4% 2017 2018: 84.2% 2018 2019: 82.8% 2019 2020: 90.0% 2020 2021: 92.3% 2021 2022: 89.5% 2022 2023: 79.2% 2023 2024: 90.1% 2024 2025: 55.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008513058.8%
2009543768.5%
2010382873.7%
2011423173.8%
2012412970.7%
2013473268.1%
2014433172.1%
2015543972.2%
2016775368.8%
2017534177.4%
2018766484.2%
2019645382.8%
2020605490.0%
2021524892.3%
2022575189.5%
2023483879.2%
2024716490.1%
2025563155.4%
20267500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,049 1.2% 11.4% 76.5% 0.2%
Action 2 493 2.4% 7.9% 84.8% 0.8%
Action 3 123 2.4% 2.4% 90.2% 0.8%
Action 4 63 1.6% 4.8% 92.1% 0.0%
Action 5 24 4.2% 4.2% 87.5% 4.2%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 6 of 281 office actions
All years 1.7% 30 of 1,767 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
10.0%
2.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.5%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
5.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 7, 2025 17/138,325 Affirmed §103
Apr. 11, 2018 14/623,052 Affirmed §103
Feb. 28, 2017 12/956,792 Reversed §102
May. 12, 2015 12/472,643 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 20, 2013 11/769,425 Reversed N/A
Jun. 17, 2013 11/767,094 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.