Examiner Xiuqin Sun

Grant ratio: 66.8% (60th percentile in Art Unit 2863 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79080
Primary art unit
2863
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
636
Granted applications
425
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2280
Supervisor
Shelby A. Turner
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6334

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 58.3% 1.73
Group 131 67.2% 1.82
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.40 1,525 office actions across 636 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 629 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.1%
1 OA 253 39.8%
2 OAs 172 27.0%
3 OAs 70 11.0%
4 OAs 61 9.6%
5+ OAs 73 11.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 91.7% 2008 2009: 70.7% 2009 2010: 93.1% 2010 2011: 71.0% 2011 2012: 82.9% 2012 2013: 78.9% 2013 2014: 72.2% 2014 2015: 80.6% 2015 2016: 63.0% 2016 2017: 57.1% 2017 2018: 63.2% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 70.7% 2020 2021: 73.3% 2021 2022: 81.3% 2022 2023: 58.3% 2023 2024: 52.8% 2024 2025: 29.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008363391.7%
2009412970.7%
2010292793.1%
2011312271.0%
2012413482.9%
2013383078.9%
2014362672.2%
2015362980.6%
2016271763.0%
2017281657.1%
2018382463.2%
2019221986.4%
2020412970.7%
2021302273.3%
2022322681.3%
2023241458.3%
2024361952.8%
202531929.0%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 629 14.1% 10.0% 67.1% 3.0%
Action 2 376 18.9% 13.6% 63.3% 3.2%
Action 3 204 17.6% 7.8% 68.6% 2.5%
Action 4 134 16.4% 7.5% 70.9% 3.0%
Action 5 73 9.6% 4.1% 79.5% 4.1%
Action 6 42 2.4% 2.4% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 7 27 3.7% 7.4% 85.2% 3.7%
Action 8 19 10.5% 10.5% 73.7% 0.0%
Action 9 9 22.2% 11.1% 44.4% 0.0%
Action 10 5 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 24.5% 59 of 241 office actions
All years 15.3% 233 of 1,525 office actions
Change +9.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.5%
2.7%
7.5%
4.9%
1.8%
1.1%
2014: Alice
9.1%
18.8%
36.2%
44.4%
39.6%
2019: PEG
9.5%
8.0%
9.3%
7.5%
14.3%
2024: AI examples
22.2%
2025: August memo
23.1%
33.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 6, 2019 13/855,130 Affirmed §101 · §102
Jul. 25, 2019 14/224,752 Reversed §101 · §103
Mar. 28, 2018 14/440,271 Reversed §101
Oct. 27, 2015 12/476,378 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.