Examiner Liam R. Casey

Grant ratio: 41.0% (19th percentile in Art Unit 2863 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.38. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2022
Grant ratio 41.0%
Average office actions / grant 3.38
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89958
Primary art unit
2863
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
222
Granted applications
91

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 58.3% 1.73
Group 131 67.2% 1.82
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.31 744 office actions across 225 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 225 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 47 20.9%
2 OAs 56 24.9%
3 OAs 31 13.8%
4 OAs 45 20.0%
5+ OAs 46 20.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 33.3% 2013 2014: 53.6% 2014 2015: 34.6% 2015 2016: 28.6% 2016 2017: 28.0% 2017 2018: 41.2% 2018 2019: 14.3% 2019 2020: 43.2% 2020 2021: 83.3% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201318633.3%
2014281553.6%
201526934.6%
201621628.6%
201725728.0%
2018341441.2%
201914214.3%
2020371643.2%
2021181583.3%
202211100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 225 4.9% 2.7% 82.2% 2.7%
Action 2 178 5.6% 3.9% 79.2% 7.9%
Action 3 122 7.4% 2.5% 79.5% 6.6%
Action 4 91 9.9% 1.1% 83.5% 3.3%
Action 5 46 6.5% 2.2% 78.3% 8.7%
Action 6 32 3.1% 6.3% 90.6% 0.0%
Action 7 19 5.3% 0.0% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 8 14 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 9 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 6.2% 46 of 744 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
3.4%
6.7%
13.8%
8.2%
10.4%
2019: PEG
1.4%
2.6%
9.5%
100.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 3/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 4/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 23, 2022 15/951,421 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Jun. 7, 2021 15/214,625 Reversed §103
May. 17, 2021 14/889,955 Affirmed §103
Feb. 2, 2021 15/315,790 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Mar. 24, 2020 13/230,071 Affirmed in part §101 · §103 · §112 · §120
Dec. 16, 2019 13/779,900 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 18, 2017 13/110,541 Affirmed §101
Mar. 23, 2017 13/031,325 Affirmed §103
Jan. 30, 2017 13/197,619 Reversed §103
Jan. 10, 2017 13/126,699 Affirmed §103
Oct. 12, 2016 13/126,605 Affirmed §103
Jun. 8, 2016 13/197,713 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.